R (Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council - definição. O que é R (Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council. Significado, conceito
Diclib.com
Dicionário ChatGPT
Digite uma palavra ou frase em qualquer idioma 👆
Idioma:

Tradução e análise de palavras por inteligência artificial ChatGPT

Nesta página você pode obter uma análise detalhada de uma palavra ou frase, produzida usando a melhor tecnologia de inteligência artificial até o momento:

  • como a palavra é usada
  • frequência de uso
  • é usado com mais frequência na fala oral ou escrita
  • opções de tradução de palavras
  • exemplos de uso (várias frases com tradução)
  • etimologia

O que (quem) é R (Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council - definição


R (Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council         
R (Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton CC [2010] UKSC 20 is an English public law case involving invalid considerations of (factors considered by) a local council in making a compulsory purchase order. Judicial review was available and upheld in this case on one or more of four available grounds, namely: error of law, irrationality, serious procedural irregularity, and action for an improper purpose.
City of Wolverhampton Council elections         
  • 2004 results map
  • 2006 results map
  • 2007 results map
  • 2008 results map
  • 2010 results map
  • 2018 results map
  • 2021 results map
City of Wolverhampton Council elections are held three years out of every four, with a third of the council elected each time. City of Wolverhampton Council is the local authority for the metropolitan borough of Wolverhampton in the West Midlands, England.
1984 Wolverhampton Metropolitan Borough Council election         
The Council elections held in Wolverhampton on Thursday 3 May 1984 were one third, and 20 of the 60 seats were up for election.

Wikipédia

R (Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council
R (Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton CC [2010] UKSC 20 is an English public law case involving invalid considerations of (factors considered by) a local council in making a compulsory purchase order. Judicial review was available and upheld in this case on one or more of four available grounds, namely: error of law, irrationality, serious procedural irregularity, and action for an improper purpose.